Response to Intervention (RTI) normally involves three tiers of support. The first tier "represents instruction and services available to all students, generally provided at the classroom level" (Brozo, 2009-2010). Brozo (2009-2010) goes on to explain the second tier's objective is to work short-term with small groups of students who need help. Tier three involves the more intense level of instruction. It is usually carried out on a one-to-one basis. The tier of support a student is placed in depends on their needs with the least amount of extra support provided for the student to make successful gains (Brozo, 2009-2010).
Interestingly, the majority of research done on RTI is at the elementary level. As a result, middle and high schools have been forced to devise their own intervention plans. Three vital questions for secondary professionals when considering how they are going to devise an RTI-like program include:
- Is RTI a feasible structure for secondary literacy?
- Is RTI the most effective model for a comprehensive secondary literacy program?
- Can RTI provide responsive literacy instruction for all students (Brozo, 2009-2010)?
"The key principle of RTI2 is that any intervention is predicated on the notion that Tier 1 core
instruction is responsive, standards-based, and data-driven... instruction be scaffolded so that
students on all points of the learning continuum can benefit from the educational environment of
the general education classroom." (Fischer & Frey, 2010, p. 25)
References
Brozo, W. G. (2009-2010). Response to intervention or responsive instruction? Challenges and possibilites of response to intervention for adolescent literacy. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 53 (4), 277-281.
Fischer, D. & Frey, N. (2010). Enhancing RTI: How to ensure success with effective classroom instruction and intervention.Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
No comments:
Post a Comment